- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 08:23:10 +0100
- To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>, norcie@cdt.org
- Cc: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>, "public-dwbp-comments@w3.org" <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
Looks like you got that gig then, Eric - thank you! As you know, Eric, it's the privacy issues that you raised about data and metadata that are the potential overlap. I don't imagine the PING folks will have a lot to say about persistent identifiers, API calls etc. so I hope that we can minimise what we're asking Greg and his colleagues to do. Thanks Phil. On 24/05/2016 20:41, Eric Stephan wrote: > Hi Greg, Phil, and DWBP WG, > > It almost seems like a matrix (table) of privacy questions and the best > practices would be useful, blank cells could reflect non-applicability. > What do you think? If it is useful, I am happy to help. > > Kind regards, > > Eric Stephan > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote: > >> Hi Phil, >> >> Thanks for reaching out! Sorry to hear about your tight deadline. >> >> In order to speed things up, as a first, step, could you or someone from >> the HTML5 team please use the PING Privacy Questionnaire[1] to do an >> initial self review of your standard? (We would also love to get feedback >> on how the privacy questionnaire can be improved :) ) >> >> I'd be happy to work with you and your team to identify any remaining >> issues that may be present in addition to those uncovered by the self >> review. >> >> There is a PING call on 5/26 as well in case you want to join in and >> discuss further. >> >> [1] http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/ >> >> >> /********************************************/ >> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org) >> Staff Technologist >> Center for Democracy & Technology >> District of Columbia office >> (p) 202-637-9800 >> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt >> >> /*******************************************/ >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> Dear Ping members, >>> >>> The Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group has published three >>> documents that are close to completion, two of which we'd be grateful if >>> you could review. In general, privacy issues don't arise in this work but: >>> >>> 1. The Data on the Web Best Practices document itself has references to >>> privacy in its introduction [1] and in a section on data enrichment [2]. >>> >>> 2. The WG's charter [3] includes the line: "Ensure that the privacy >>> concerns are properly included in the Quality and Granularity vocabulary." >>> The vocabulary in question is at [4] and we would be grateful if you could >>> confirm that no specific privacy issues are raised by that work (I think it >>> unlikely but I may be missing something). >>> >>> The WG plans to make the transition to CR for its BP doc (which is Rec >>> Track) during next month so we're setting a (very) tight deadline on >>> comments of 12 June. >>> >>> Thank you for your help, >>> >>> Phil. >>> >>> >>> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#intro >>> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#enrichment >>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/05/odbp-charter#coordination >>> [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/ >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Phil Archer >>> W3C Data Activity Lead >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >>> >>> http://philarcher.org >>> +44 (0)7887 767755 >>> @philarcher1 >>> >>> >> > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 07:23:22 UTC