W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-comments@w3.org > December 2016

Re: Feedback on current editor draft of BPs

From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 07:55:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CABP9CAFM-y8W9W+TWoFM=Ex29ba_41q1isGmOep6CwMgmF8zLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Cc: W3C DWBP WG - Comments <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Hi Bernadette,

My comments on your commits are listed below.
>
And my responses are in-lined... :)


> 1509848
> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/1509848f1ecd212ee3fcc9e1211a123b96f56bb0> I
> think this edition changes the semantics of the question. The BP should
> deal with something that is unique to the Web. I suggest to not change this
> sentence.
>
The point is probably more about the wording than the semantic. The scope
section say "specifically relevant" and the test says "unique". I wonder if
the two can be considered equivalent or not, and if not suggested we could
adjust the text to make it consistent. That could also mean changing the
"specifically relevant" into "unique" instead of the inverse. But I
otherwise agree not to touch it.


> 9873c6b
> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/9873c6bb8f602a977729ad993614840bf0bf81a2> I
> think we should leave dct:publisher because this can also be seen as a
> descriptive metadata, no? I agree with including dct:language.
>
Ok but then I think the description of :transport-agency-mycity should be
added to the example. It was also a remark about not adding elements which
are introduced later.

bf13401
> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/bf134013217aaab698a257e814d53fb896b38dfb> My
> suggestion:
> Examples of the application of some Best Practices are shown using Turtle
> [[Turtle]] or JSON-LD [[JSON-LD]]
>
Ok!


> 0f5f29a
> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/0f5f29af971b9ae241d1e5a3382787a4a281bb12> The
> idea in this case is that a machine can find the data license, but the data
> license itself doesn't need to be processable.
>
Ok!


> db17381
> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/db17381dfa68740960d5ee75985181a551ca4694> I
> think it is ok to leave axiom. There is also a reference to OWL2, so more
> details can be found there.
>
Ok!


> 7374375
> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/737437595ec6177ffe656e8e41c611326470e763> I
> think if we change the first sentence to remove the reference to sensitive
> data, then it becomes more generic and solves the problem.
>
 Ok!

0c313df
> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/0c313df66691323f9f81e44fc3ac256cf96ee887> I
> think so. However, I think this update requires a major change on the BP. I
> suggest to leave the way it is.
>
Ok let's leave it then :-)

Cheers,
Christophe


>
>
>
> cheers,
> Bernadette
>
>
>
> 2016-11-28 10:38 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@gmail.com>
> :
>
>> Hi Bernadette,
>>
>> Thanks for considering all the comments :-)
>> As you saw I just commented further (at the bottom) on your comment "
>> e70fc2c
>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/e70fc2cba67d453b7e6d163cffb68a14bf83cb5a> I
>> used the http://www.geonames.org/3399415 and it worked. Is it really
>> necessary to change?"because I think that the change is indeed needed to
>> get working LD links.
>>
>> Regarding "c7496c2
>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/commit/c7496c219747b2138ccb7d1570a1880cb210de51> The
>> example shows the inclusion of the locale parameters metadata, followed by
>> a locale-neutral representation of bus fare data. The example has to parts:
>> one that shows that metadata and the other one to show an example of
>> representation. I suggest to leave it like this." I understand these are
>> two different parts but still think it's confusing to see them together.
>> Maybe you could just split that code into two <pre> ?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Christophe
>>
>> On 28 November 2016 at 12:41, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Christophe,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your detailed review! I checked each one of the commits
>>> and most of them are editorial changes and can easily be incorporated on
>>> the document.
>>>
>>> I'd like to kindly ask you to take a look on comments that I included on
>>> the pull request [1] and please let me know if you are ok with them.
>>>
>>> kind regards,
>>> Bernadette
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/474
>>>
>>> 2016-10-06 19:46 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <
>>> christophe.gueret@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Dear everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Congrats on all the great work :-)
>>>>
>>>> I have (finally !) been through the latest draft of the best practices
>>>> and made a number of comments which I just proposed with a pull request (
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/474). Hope you will find those useful.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Christophe
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>> Centro de Informática
>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----------------
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
>
Received on Monday, 5 December 2016 07:56:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:38:14 UTC