Re: W3C DPVCG Submission - Machine-Readable Transparency Architecture for Multi-Jurisdictional Enforcement

Hello DPV'ers, 

 I noticed a faulty link in this last email and - also want share DPV implementation work and Article on the Environmental Impact of black-boxed privacy proposed in the Omni-bus.   

1. Full Report  <https://blog.transparencylab.ca/machine-readable-transparency-architecture?source=copy_link> Machine Readable - Policy is Architecture 
2. Also Posted on Github -  DPV implementation report for GPC, MYTerms, and GPRC  <https://github.com/Digital-Transparency-Lab/iso27560-1_unrp/blob/main/Documentation/W3C%20DPV%2027560-1%20Implementation%20Report:%20GPC,%20MyTerms,%20and%2072%20Digital%20Transparency%20Control%20Contexts>with recommendations   and linked this to the 414 Issue, 
3. Previous Article Updated - Environmental Impact of Omnibus vs Transparent by Default  <https://0pn-lab.notion.site/env-impact-omnibus-vs-dtbd?source=copy_link>with DPV. 

Best Regard,

Mark. 

PS.  You are invited to show interest by filling in this regulatory capacity innovation survey <https://www.gdtagroup.org/event-details/regulatory-capacity-innovation-workshop-1> which we are conducting.  As a way to a) see what the regulatory appetite is for international transparency b) validate approaches to regulatory innovation and standards adoption c) collect interest in this space  

x

> On 7 Jan 2026, at 16:45, Mark Lizar <smartopian@icloud.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear DPV,
> 
> I am submitting this executive (draft report on Converting Cookies to Notice Receipts with W3C DPV to enable proportionate reciprocal accountability across 58+ Convention 108+ jurisdictions.  With a workshop invite attached below.  Please include in scope of regulatory options. 
> 
> Policy Brief: The Problem, Evidence, and Solution
> 
> The Problem
> 
> €12.3+ billion in penalties (2019-2026) demonstrate systematic failure: controllers deploy cookies, create identifiers, and transfer data BEFORE meaningful notice.
> 
> The Legal Requirement
> 
> Convention 108+ Article 8(2), GDPR Article 13(1), ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3), Quebec Law 25 Article 8.1 all mandate:
> 
> Notice of scope and risks BEFORE identification, transfer, tracking, or profiling
> 
> The Current Violation
> 
> EU Omnibus Article 88b proposes browser-intermediated consent that:
> 
> Places control with third-party intermediaries (Google/Apple/Microsoft), not device owners
> Fails Controller-ID first requirement (cookie placed BEFORE controller disclosure)
> Provides no bilateral proof of notice
> Creates single point of failure in foreign vendors
> The Evidence
> 
> TPI-R Chrome Case Study and assessment quantifies systematic violations:
> 
> TPI-1 (Controller ID Timing): -1/100 — Individual must identify to see surveillance scope
> TPI-2 (Disclosure Completeness): -1/100 — FISA 702/EO 12333 risks concealed
> TPI-3 (Rights Access): 0/100 — IAB TCF bypass (€250K fine, Brussels Court 2025)
> TPI-4 (Transfer Integrity): -1/100 — Surveillance law exposure omitted
> The Solution: Notice Receipt - Glass-Boxed Governance Architecture (like a bank account)
> 
> Mandate 4 requirements:
> 
> Controller-ID First — Anonymous access to /.well-known/notice.txt BEFORE processing
> Bilateral Notice Receipts — Cryptographic proof synchronized between controller and individual
> Device Owner Control — Permission controlled by device owner, not browser intermediary
> TPI-R Verification — Minimum score ≥70/100 to demonstrate compliance
> Regulatory Impact
> 
> Cost reduction: 95% (€100K → €5K per case)
> Time reduction: 97% (12-18 months → 2 weeks)
> Prevention ROI: 20× (€5K prevention vs €100K+ remediation)
> Multi-jurisdictional coordination — Single TPI-Report enables enforcement across 58+ jurisdictions
> Three Immediate Recommendations
> 
> Require Regulated Digital Transparency with Machine-Readable Policy and Proportionate Reciprocal Disclosure: Replace industry-controlled "cookie consent" with regulated Notice Receipt architecture using W3C Data Privacy Vocabularies (DPV) for standardized machine-readable transparency. Mandate ISO/IEC 27560-1 Universal Notice Receipt Profile with Convention 108+ DPV Extension as reference implementation.
> Adopt Machine-Readable Policy Standards for Regulated Transparency Governance: Establish Convention 108+ Article 12 Code of Conduct referencing ISO/IEC 27560-1 Profile with W3C DPV as normative/regulated notice vocabulary. Enable automated TPI-R verification at internet scale (95% cost reduction, 97% time reduction). Establish W3C-ISO/IEC liaison for harmonized Convention 108+ DPV Extension.
> Distinguish Permission Management (Software) from Consent Management (Human Control) Through Proportionate Reciprocal Co-Regulated Architecture: Consent is human judgment requiring meaningful choice through regulated transparency. Permissions are software-enforced access controls. Machine-readable DPV policies enable proportionate verification: automated assessment of transparency claims without manual investigation.
> Full executive report (Accessed HERE) <https://drive.proton.me/urls/J41KK131MM%23crRiIFZ1gelU>. Complete technical documentation with appendices available online: [Machine Readable Transparency: Policy is Architecture Report <https://blog.transparencylab.ca/machine-readable-transparency-architecture?source=copy_link>]
> 
> This work represents 14+ years of longitudinal research (2010-2026) and standards development, culminating in ISO/IEC 27560-1 Universal Notice Receipt Profile submission to ISO/IEC JTC 1 SC 27 WG 5. Please consider this a DPV Normative  proposal. 
> 
> Mark Lizar
> 
> ISO/IEC 27560-1 Profile Editor | ISO/IEC 27568 Editor | ISO/IEC 27091 Editor
> 
> Kantara Initiative ANCR WG Editor, TPI-R Benchmark Editor, W3C DPV Founding Member
> 
> 
> 
> Regulatory Capacity Innovation Workshop Invite
> 
> Date: Thursday, January 15, 2026
> 
> Time: 10:30 AM – 12:30 PM EST (GMT-5)
> 
> Location: Virtual Event
> 
> Host: Global Digital Transparency Alliance
> 
> Purpose
> 
> Explore Regulatory Capacity Innovation with Voluntary Standards
> 
> Key Topics
> 
> Survey findings on regulatory capacity gaps
> January Task Force participation opportunities
> Overview of International Transparency Framework
> Regulatory and Standards Innovation Survey
> Registration
> 
> RSVP at: GDTA Event  <https://www.gdtagroup.org/event-details/regulatory-consultation-webinar-1?currency=CAD>
> For more information, visit the GDTA website or contact the organizers through the event page.
> 
> 
>