- From: beatriz.gesteves <beatriz.gesteves@upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:16:52 +0200
- To: Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community Group <public-dpvcg@w3.org>
- Cc: Georg <georg@signatu.com>
- Message-ID: <f0efcfd767ae21d40198eaf800a43eb7@upm.es>
Hi all, As discussed in the last meeting, I went over a part of the concepts for the DGA extension with Georg and we want to raise some discussion points. -------- Entities -------- 1 - With regards to the labelling of the data intermediation service providers, which are currently proposed to be labelled as DataIntermediationServiceProviderForDataHolder and DataIntermediationServiceProviderForDataSubject, we were wondering if the correct phrasing is provider for data holder/subject or if we should rephrase it to provider on behalf of data holder/subject, similarly to GDPR's terminology where a data processor processes personal data on behalf of the controller. 2 - Update the data user's definition from "An entity who has access and the right to use personal or non-personal data for commercial or non-commercial purposes" to "An entity who receives and/or has access to personal or non-personal data for commercial or non-commercial purposes" 3 - We are missing a definition for "privacy sector body". In addition, we have the "Sector" concept modelled in DPV, but there are no concepts for "Public Sector" and "Private Sector". Is this something that needs to be modelled within DPV? 4 - The definition of "SME organisation" needs to be improved, which may prove difficult as different sources mention a different number of employees for it to be classified as an SME. In addition, "micro-enterprise" can also be a concept to be considered to be modelled as it mentioned in other acts (DORA,...). ---------- Purposes ---------- 1 - @Harsh is there a source for the proposed MisusePreventionAndDetection purpose? It would be nice to have an example to understand where such a purpose would be properly used. 2 - Regarding the SupportInformedConsentChoices purpose, should we modelled it as a more generic concept to cover choices not just related with consent? For instance, changing the definition from "Supporting individuals in understanding and making choices with respect to informed consent" to "Supporting individuals in understanding and making choices with respect to e.g. consent"? ------ TOMs ------ 1 - In addition to CommercialConfidentialityAgreement and StatisticalConfidentialityAgreement, should we have a ConfidentialityAgreement concept that can be reused for other types of agreements? 2 - How is the DataTransferNotice different from DPV's PrivacyNotice? And do we also need a ThirdCountryDataRequestNotice? 3 - Introducing LegalMeasure implies restructuring the dpv:OrganisationalMeasure taxonomy e.g. LegalAgreement should go under LegalMeasure? 4 - Change PersonalDataReuseNotice to ConsentReuseNotice as this notice is specifically related to consent. More opinions are welcome on these and on the other terms, preferably through the mailing list to have a record or directly in DPVCG's meetings. Best regards, Beatriz
Received on Tuesday, 18 July 2023 14:17:00 UTC