Fwd: Legal semantics inquiry

Hi Georgios,

This is great !  Thank you for sharing,

We are looking at the use of semantics internationally for transboarder data flows internationally (inc GPDR)  and it would be great to construct this with the natural ability to work with the DPV.

I will look at your materials- and if you have any thoughts on international usage, this would be very welcome.

- Mark

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Georgios V. Lioudakis" <gelioud@ieee.org<mailto:gelioud@ieee.org>>
Subject: Re: Legal semantics inquiry
Date: 10 July 2020 at 12:59:06 GMT-4
To: OCG Info <info@openconsent.com<mailto:info@openconsent.com>>, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at<mailto:simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>>
Cc: Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community Group <public-dpvcg@w3.org<mailto:public-dpvcg@w3.org>>

Hi all,

We have implemented such functionality in the context of the H2020 BPR4GDPR project.
The solution consists in an ontological access and usage control framework that is quite expressive and flexible for incorporating various types of constraints.
The rules build upon an information model that captures various concepts related to data protection, including data types, purposes, types of operations, etc.

You can have a look at the respective deliverable, abailable here: https://www.bpr4gdpr.eu/results/deliverables/d3-2-initial-specification-and-prototyping-of-the-policy-framework/
(preliminary version, the final version is due September 2020)

What is of interest regarding the topic under discussion is Section 2.

Please let me know if you need any clarification or additional information.

I could also provide a presentation of the BPR4GDPR approach for privacy protection that is largely based on ontologies and has tackled various of the issues discussed in the group.

Best,
George.

--
Georgios V. Lioudakis
Electrical & Computer Engineer, Dr.-Ing.
ICT abovo Information & Communication Technologies PC
20 Iridanou str, 115 28
Athens, Greece
Tel: +30 210 7238856
Fax: +30 210 7238854
Mob: +30 697 3435121
e-mail: georgios.lioudakis@ict-abovo.gr<mailto:georgios.lioudakis@ict-abovo.gr>






On 10/07/2020 13:23, OCG Info wrote:
Hi,
On 10 Jul 2020, at 03:23, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> wrote:

Hi!

We were discussing the semantics that are used in the
application of a purpose specification - for example consent for
genomic medical research, would have a use one, only use at this time
etc.

i.e. defining constraints for / scoping the purpose to which the given consent applies to?
Yes

that there are legal
semantics that they combined into a label that defines both the
vocabulary and the semantics.

e.g. :OnlyValidDuringEverySecondWednesdayInSeptemberToDecemberPurpose or a description of the "semantics" in NL used as a value of rdfs:comment etc. ?
Yes

br simon

---
DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna

www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys

Am 2020-07-09 04:16, schrieb OCG Info:
HI All,
Harsh asked me on the call yesterday to submit a question I hd to the
list.  We were discussing the semantics that are used in the
application of a purpose specification - for example consent for
genomic medical research, would have a use one, only use at this time
etc.
Harsh and Georg also reported a meeting with GA4GH, and its clear that
beyond purpose specification and the vocabulary that there are legal
semantics that they combined into a label that defines both the
vocabulary and the semantics.
Is there anyone working on legal semantics ?
 A key reason I am asking, is that this is a topic in the Trust over
IP Decentralised Semantics WG and we will be exploring the data legal
relationship between vocabulary, ontology and semantics for digital
ledger consent.
Does anyone on this list have a reference to any existing work ?   And
of course is this something that is in scope of discussion at DPV CG ?
- Kind Regards.
Mark