About recommendation track and other questions

A working group in the Danish Agency for Digitisation is working on a 
project that aims to standardize digital consent forms across public 
authorities and to establish a digital infrastructure that handles the 
basic flows of consent forms.

The working group is currently looking into international work of 
relevance including the work done by the Data Privacy Vocabularies and 
Controls Community Group.

The group has previous knowledge about these projects:

·GConsent [1]

·CDMM Consent ontology [2][3]

·Kantara Consent Receipt [4]

  The working group has given me the following question that I am hereby 
forwarding to the CG:

·To what degree has the above mentioned projects influenced the products 
of the CG? Can the vocabularies created by the CG be considered as 
replacing the mentioned projects?

·How likely is it that the vocabularies developed by the CG will enter 
the W3C recommendation track? In the event that the vocabularies should 
not – at some point in time - be given W3C recommendation status how 
will the stability and resolvability of the vocabularies be guarantied?

·Do the CG have knowledge about projects where DPV is planned to be used 
within the European Union, for example Single Digital Gateway or the 
newly proposed Data Governance Act?


Regards,

Peter Bruhn Andersen

[1]http://openscience.adaptcentre.ie/ontologies/GConsent/docs/ontology 
<http://openscience.adaptcentre.ie/ontologies/GConsent/docs/ontology>

[2]https://www.w3.org/community/dpvcg/wiki/CDMM_Consent_Ontology 
<https://www.w3.org/community/dpvcg/wiki/CDMM_Consent_Ontology>

[3]https://openscience.adaptcentre.ie/projects/CDMM/ 
<https://openscience.adaptcentre.ie/projects/CDMM/>

[4]https://kantarainitiative.org/file-downloads/file-download-consent-receipt-recommendation-v1-0-report/ 
<https://kantarainitiative.org/file-downloads/file-download-consent-receipt-recommendation-v1-0-report/>