Re: rdfs:Property VS rdf:Property

Thanks Livio.

Hello All. Please see below message from Livio regarding an error in the 
DPV serialisation where it has rdfs:Property instead of rdf:Property. My 
reply follow after it.

For some reason, this message was not posted to the mailing list (I 
cannot see it on the website) and hence am including it.

On 25/08/2020 10:00, Livio Robaldo wrote:
> Dear all,
> I found out that all properties in are defined 
> as instances of rdfs:Property, e.g., "dpv:consentNotice a rdfs:Property ;"
> rdfs:Property does not exist, it should be rdf:Property (see 
> As a consequence, when opening the file with TopBraid no property is 
> displayed.
> Harsh will fix it as soon as possible.
> All the best
> Livio

The error arose from an error in the script (by me!) [1] that generates 
the DPV serialisations. I'm happy to fix this, and if anyone else wants 
to do so - please go ahead.
I would actually suggest taking this opportunity to improve the way we 
generate DPV documentation and serialisations (maybe using R2RML to get 
RDF from CSV?).


Harshvardhan Pandit, Ph.D
Researcher at ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin

Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2020 10:39:26 UTC