Re: dpvcg-ACTION-53: Together with harsh, fajar, javier start on a base ontology, suggest a namespace, etc. and start populate the sub-taxonomies, agree on language to model it.

Hi all,

I have to confess that I always have problems with the dpvcg acronym (I 
hope I'm not the only one :). Can I suggest to look for a more 
comprehensible namespace? Just to give a first seed, what about "priv"? 
It's short, it reminds of "privacy" and it is quite close to the 
well-know prov, so people would remember it (and it does not exist, 
http://prefix.cc/priv).

On a different note, I come from the area of indexing/compressing RDF 
and my skills on ontology engineering skills are rather basic. But could 
it be possible to present a proposal with two flavors, RDFS with the 
taxonomy and OWL2 with further restrictions and expressivity?

Best,

Javier


On 09/12/18 21:11, Harshvardhan J. Pandit wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Regarding namespace, we can get a w3id with the prefi dpvcg and host 
> it at one of our institutes for the time being while we wait to see 
> whether we can have space provided by w3c.
> If we need further classification for namespaces:
> * dpvcg-psdata (personal data is too long)
> * dpvcg-purpose
> * dpvcg-process
> * dpvcg-sec (security)
> * dpvcg-storage
>
> language to model: Ideally for a taxonomy, RDFS is sufficient. 
> However, I would propose OWL2 (expressivity discussion needed?) as it 
> allows us to further develop axioms and constraints w.r.t to the data 
> model.
>
> However, this can be daunting to adopt/use by non-semweb people (both 
> academia and industry), who may only wish to use it as a taxonomy. 
> Therefore, I would suggest that at some point we also think about 
> usability/adoption of this work.
>
> I would suggest creating different ontologies for each 'thing' 
> (purpose, storage, etc.) we are looking at and then merging them as 
> required. This would be  easier to develop and maintain (w.r.t. 
> different people acting on it).
>
> Regards,
> Harsh
>
> On 04/12/18 11:36 AM, Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community 
> Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> dpvcg-ACTION-53: Together with harsh, fajar, javier start on a base 
>> ontology, suggest a namespace, etc. and start populate the 
>> sub-taxonomies, agree on language to model it.
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/dpvcg/track/actions/53
>>
>> Assigned to: Axel Polleres
>

-- 
Javier D. Fernández

WU Vienna, Institute for Information Business
Tel: +43-1-31336/5241
https://www.wu.ac.at/en/infobiz/team/fernandez/

Received on Monday, 10 December 2018 08:41:32 UTC