- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:02:52 -0500
- To: "Matt Garrish" <matt.garrish@bell.net>
- Cc: public-dpub-aria@w3.org, "'Tzviya - Hoboken Siegman'" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Message-ID: <OFAAC10A48.EAE756AA-ON86257EDC.0052A771-86257EDC.0052A8D4@us.ibm.com>
Done. Rich Schwerdtfeger From: "Matt Garrish" <matt.garrish@bell.net> To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Cc: <public-dpub-aria@w3.org>, "'Tzviya - Hoboken Siegman'" <tsiegman@wiley.com> Date: 10/09/2015 12:10 PM Subject: RE: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda Hi Rich, If you've got the spare cycles, please do. I'm at the epub 3.1 meetings in nyc right now, so I probably won't get to until after the weekend. Thanks, Matt From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com] Sent: October 9, 2015 9:56 AM To: matt.garrish@bell.net Cc: DPUB-ARIA public-dpub-aria@w3.org <public-dpub-aria@w3.org>; Tzviya - Hoboken Siegman <tsiegman@wiley.com> Subject: RE: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda We are working on getting agreement on the term. There is some talk about using rel. but that creates other issues. Matt, would you like me to change the dpub- prefixes to doc- prefixes in the dpub aria module? I am doing it now for the mapping spec. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger Inactive hide details for ---09/30/2015 03:42:52 PM---It's on my plate to remove those from the document. I just wanted confirm---09/30/2015 03:42:52 PM---It's on my plate to remove those from the document. I just wanted confirmation of term last week, as From: <matt.garrish@bell.net> To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Tzviya - Hoboken Siegman < tsiegman@wiley.com> Cc: "DPUB-ARIA public-dpub-aria@w3.org" <public-dpub-aria@w3.org> Date: 09/30/2015 03:42 PM Subject: RE: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda It's on my plate to remove those from the document. I just wanted confirmation of term last week, as I didn't see it in the last published draft and I must have been viewing a cached version of the nightly build as I couldn't find it there when I looked. Matt To: tsiegman@wiley.com CC: public-dpub-aria@w3.org From: schwer@us.ibm.com Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:43:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda Tzviya, We have these roles dpub-glossterm and dpub-glossref. Is there any reason we cannot simply use the term and Definiton roles : http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#definition http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#term Seeing that these would reside in a Glossary region. We could require that the Glossary have definition and term as required descendants. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: 2C908689.gif
Received on Monday, 12 October 2015 15:03:28 UTC