RE: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda

OK



Rich Schwerdtfeger



From:	"Matt Garrish" <matt.garrish@bell.net>
To:	Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:	<public-dpub-aria@w3.org>, "'Tzviya - Hoboken Siegman'"
            <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Date:	10/09/2015 12:10 PM
Subject:	RE: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda



Hi Rich,

If you've got the spare cycles, please do. I'm at the epub 3.1 meetings in
nyc right now, so I probably won't get to until after the weekend.

Thanks,

Matt

From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: October 9, 2015 9:56 AM
To: matt.garrish@bell.net
Cc: DPUB-ARIA public-dpub-aria@w3.org <public-dpub-aria@w3.org>; Tzviya -
Hoboken Siegman <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Subject: RE: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda



We are working on getting agreement on the term. There is some talk about
using rel. but that creates other issues.

Matt, would you like me to change the dpub- prefixes to doc- prefixes in
the dpub aria module?

I am doing it now for the mapping spec.

Rich


Rich Schwerdtfeger

Inactive hide details for ---09/30/2015 03:42:52 PM---It's on my plate to
remove those from the document. I just wanted confirm---09/30/2015 03:42:52
PM---It's on my plate to remove those from the document. I just wanted
confirmation of term last week, as

From: <matt.garrish@bell.net>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Tzviya - Hoboken Siegman <
tsiegman@wiley.com>
Cc: "DPUB-ARIA public-dpub-aria@w3.org" <public-dpub-aria@w3.org>
Date: 09/30/2015 03:42 PM
Subject: RE: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda




It's on my plate to remove those from the document. I just wanted
confirmation of term last week, as I didn't see it in the last published
draft and I must have been viewing a cached version of the nightly build as
I couldn't find it there when I looked.

Matt

To: tsiegman@wiley.com
CC: public-dpub-aria@w3.org
From: schwer@us.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:43:43 -0500
Subject: Re: [dpub-aria] 20151001 agenda

Tzviya,


We have these roles dpub-glossterm and dpub-glossref. Is there any reason
we cannot simply use the term and Definiton roles :

http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#definition
http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#term

Seeing that these would reside in a Glossary region. We could require that
the Glossary have definition and term as required descendants.

Rich


Rich Schwerdtfeger

Received on Monday, 12 October 2015 14:50:17 UTC