- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:00:47 -0700
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "Gunderson, Jon R" <jongund@illinois.edu>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>, Markus Gylling <markus.gylling@gmail.com>, "public-digipub-ig@w3.org" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, W3C PF - DPUB Joint Task Force <public-dpub-aria@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:59 , Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > > + I think that if details/summary is a useful pattern for the use cases it makes a good case for getting it implemented in browsers that don't currently support it. > It certainly seems that proposing something that is neither currently specified nor implemented (describedat), as an alternative for something that is specified but not yet completely implemented (details/summary), is strange at best. :-( David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:02:03 UTC