Re: draft text for charter

"A final thing: during our latest call somebody raised the issue of what the 
fate of the W3C accessibility note, as well as the EPUB accessibility 
document will be. Your text may not cover that.
To take an example, the DPUB WG may not address pagination directly, because 
that may be, after all, in the realm of the CSS WG + Houdini, therefore none 
of our recommendation will cover the pagination-related a11y issues. I think 
one alternative was that we would discuss with the WCAG WG on whether the 
DPUB WG would publish, on rec-track, a separate WCAG-like document; what 
happened to that idea?"


Hi Ivan,

The text is more of generalized statement for charter. This is why we did 
not wrote specifics.
The issues mentioned by you (future of EPUB accessibility spec., DPUB 
accessibility note etc.) have to be resolved along with DPUB group.
If you want us to include these points in the charter text proposal, we can 
do it. Else if you want us to iron these out as agenda item of IG call, we 
can proceed in that way.


With regards
Avneesh

With regards
Avneesh
-----Original Message----- 
From: Ivan Herman
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:40
To: Avneesh Singh
Cc: George Kerscher ; Deborah Kaplan ; public-dpub-accessibility@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft text for charter

Received on Monday, 13 February 2017 06:22:24 UTC