RE: Introduction and question

Thanks. I missed this tracking-protection page, it looks great. There is
good overview of items I missed earlier on the Do-Not-Track Community Group
(DNT) landing page. Maybe it is a good idea to place this link with a small
introduction (relation between the two groups/sites) on the DNT landing page.

 

I like the timeline table on the tracking-protection site very much. It gives
a great overview of your plans for the coming period. I think it should be even
greater if the items mentioned in the table were also clickable, which would make the
navigation to products and their status even better on the site. Maybe items
like FPWD could be explained for those who don’t know that the abbreviations
mean something like first public working draft.
Kind regards, Wyb  

> Subject: Re: Introduction and question
> From: tien@eff.org
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:45:28 -0700
> CC: public-dntrack@w3.org
> To: wybmail@hotmail.com
> 
> Hello Wyb,
> 
> I'm not sure what you're looking for.  The Tracking Protection Working Group (TPWG) has been active since fall of 2011, and has a page at http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/
> 
> TPWG really launched based on the input described on this page (April 2011):
> http://www.w3.org/2011/track-privacy/
> which includes the adoption of the Do Not Track (DNT) user-agent mechanism by Mozilla earlier in 2011, and this might be the easiest place to start, as the documents available there describe the basic idea behind DNT.  
> 
> This particular "community group" was formed largely to support the work of user/privacy advocates who are also working in the larger TPWG.  
> 
> Hope that helps,
> Lee
> 
> On May 18, 2012, at 2:12 PM, wyb mail wrote:
> 
> > Hello all, 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > I have just joined the group and some other groups of W3C
> > 
> > As a supporter of open standards and because of my study Informatics, combining among others social sciences and ICT, 
> > 
> > I am very curious about what you are doing and how you are working.
> > 
> > I hope I can contribute something to the group though I am not really an engineer
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > First thing I noticed looking at the different sites of the different groups:
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > How things are organized is not always clear.
> > 
> > It is not easy as a new comer to jump in right away
> > 
> > should some standard items as an introduction not be nice, so that it becomes easier to participate quickly?   
> > 
> > so that it is clear right away what a group is doing at the moment, what the plans are and what it is in need for?
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Kind regards, Wyb
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Lee Tien
> Senior Staff Attorney
> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> 454 Shotwell Street
> San Francisco, CA  94110
> (415) 436-9333 x 102 (tel)
> (415) 436-9993 (fax)
> tien@eff.org
> 
> 
> 
>