- From: Daniel Barclay <daniel@fgm.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:04:10 -0500
- To: public-diselect-editors@w3.org
Regarding the Content Selection Primer draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-cselection-primer-20070109/ : Section 4.1.1 says: ... The characters > represent the way that the >symbol must be written to be syntactically valid within an XML document. The symbol > is reserved in XML to identify the start of an element. Note the effective syntax error (a ">" character identifies an _end_; "<" is what identifies the start). And it's the end of a _tag_, not the end of an _element_. Also, note the missing space in ">symbol" in the first quoted sentence. Additionally, the string ">" should be quoted. (I think the greater-than character should be quoted instead of being set off only by being in bold type, but I can't make that argument as strongly. The base argument is that that's standard English style. An additional argument is that a quoted form would survive a text-only cut and paste. A stronger version of that is that a quoted form would still be visible when regular and bold text isn't rendered differently, e.g., at small font sizes, or in a text-only browser.) Daniel
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 23:04:25 UTC