disposition OK RE: LC-1570 Follow on from Gilman 11

At 2:45 PM +0000 29 01 2007, Rhys Lewis wrote:
>Hello Al,
>
>Thanks again for your comments on the DISelect Last call.
>
>In your response to the disposition of comments for Gilman-11 [1], 
>you had reservations about the disposition.
>You pointed out, quite correctly, that we had failed to correct 
>the impression that DISelect could never be subsumed within the 
>namespace of the host language.
>
>The DIWG agrees with your description of the remaining issue, and 
>your resolution. The terminology has been changed. The passage 
>in the section on namespaces now reads:
>
>"DISelect is not a stand-alone document type. It is intended to be 
>integrated into other host languages such as XHTML. Such integration 
>could result in the elements and attributes described in this 
>specification being subsumed into the host language namespace. 
>Alternatively, it might result in the elements and attributes being 
>added to a host language, but in a separate namespace. The DISelect 
>namespace is provided for this purpose."
>
>I hope you feel that the new text is appropriate. Perhaps you would 
>be able to confirm that by posting to the list?

Done.  Al

>
>
>Very best wishes
>Rhys Lewis
>
>
>[1] 
><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2006OctDec/0005.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2006OctDec/0005.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-diselect-editors/2006OctDec/0004.html>
><http://www.w3.org/2007/01/MGMoverview>
>
>