- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:13:05 +0200
- To: "Rhys.Lewis@volantis.com" <Rhys.Lewis@volantis.com>
- Cc: "public-diselect-editors@w3.org" <public-diselect-editors@w3.org>
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:12:01 +0200, Rhys Lewis <Rhys.Lewis@volantis.com> wrote: > The presence of the links seems to be a function of the W3C document > preparation mechanism. I should just clarify that we use XMLSpec and > generate various forms of the document using the supplied XSL style > sheets. All processing related to TOC generation, extra links etc. is > automated and out of our hands. This is not true. You generate a specific HTML document, but there is nothing at all that prevents you from further editing that document. > So, I think that your comment actually needs to be directed at the > preparation mechanism rather than the DISelect specification, since it > affects other specifications prepared the same way too. I will also make the selectionto spec-prod. But I do not think an acceptable answer to a spec problem is to blame the tools you chose to use. > Can I suggest that you raise this with the team if you feel strongly > about this? Sure. However, let the record note that I am still unsatisfied with this respose. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk chaals@opera.com Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 11:13:20 UTC