- From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:41:26 +0700
- To: "W3C Disaster Management Ontology List" <public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <c09b00eb0706230741x40877262lde5eed2266d9e9be@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Chamindra I have started a formal evaluation page by listing existing definitions found on the web for the choices mentioned here http://esw.w3.org/topic/Naming_Survey Please enter your findingsf! Also created a resources page to link our documents and references, as you suggest, http://esw.w3.org/topic/Resources Please note that crisis management is generally intended in a business context but we can discuss this later, see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+crisis+management&btnG=Search cheers On 6/23/07, Chamindra de Silva <chamindra@opensource.lk> wrote: > > I am fine with disaster management too, however if their is enough > opinion against this term I would suggest crisis management as an > alternative. > > Chamindra de Silva > http://chamindra.googlepages.com > > > paola.dimaio@gmail.com wrote: > > thanks gav > > I dont know why I dont feel disaster is not the best word, > > > > I think I explained how I feel about disasters, disasters are > > emergencies that were not managed properly - I guess that's personal > > > > emergency is used widely, everywhere 'emergency services' there are a > > number of services listed, including ambulance, fire brigade, police of > > various kinds etc > > > > anyway, we need votes! maybe we need to wait for more people to join > > before we vote > > > > > > disaster management > > gav, don > > > > > > emergency management > > paola > > > > > > incident management > > ed > > > > > > risk management > > > > > > > > On 6/23/07, *Gavin Treadgold* <gt@kestrel.co.nz > > <mailto:gt@kestrel.co.nz>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 23/06/2007, at 15:44, paola.dimaio@gmail.com > > <mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > we seem in agreement that we should change the name from disaster > > > management to something else > > > while a plethora of better option is before us, for brevity and a > > > quick decision, can we go for > > > > > > 1 emergency management , or > > > 2. global risk management > > > > > > I am not comfortable pointing the page with an odd sounding name, > > > and some opportunties to link up with > > > other efforts are materializing we need to be able to move fast > > > > > > thoughts? > > > > Well - global risk management is not an option as it is far broader > > than what I believe we are talking about. We are talking about the > > management of a particular set of community risks. > > > > Given that when you mention emergency management to some people they > > think you are talking about hospitals and emergency departments, I > > would strongly suggest that we stick with disaster management. They > > are still the best two words I've found for communicating to people > > what I do for a living. Emergency management is fine for those in > the > > know. > > > > So my vote would be for the status quo. > > > > Cheers Gav > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Paola Di Maio ***** > > School of Information Technology > > Mae Fah Luang University > > Chiang Rai - Thailand > > ********************************************* > -- Paola Di Maio ***** School of Information Technology Mae Fah Luang University Chiang Rai - Thailand *********************************************
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 14:41:34 UTC