- From: Gavin Treadgold <gt@kestrel.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:40:42 +1200
- To: W3C Ontology List Disaster Management <public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org>
Hi Craig, You might have missed my point re: copyright. Many definitions that are currently used, are actually (c) of the standards organisation that defined them. This means that we can't copy the definition for our our use - even though they are extremely relevant to our discussion. Example may be standards organisations definitions of risk, hazard etc. I am not too concerned with regards to the copyright of our own contributions however, as I consider this to be a public domain discussion. Cheers Gavin On 22/06/2007, at 11:38, C H wrote: > Copyright issues should be minimal or nil if we all > agree that our contributions are to be released under > Creative Commons attribution-sharealike-noncommercial > license at some future point, and withheld from those > who do not accept these release terms. A commercial > user may use the material simply for remitting any and > all patent, trademark, copyright and domain name right > they may have in terms essential to the ontology's > use. > Until this is worked out, we own our own > contributions.
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 00:40:58 UTC