- From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:56:28 +0700
- To: "Gavin Treadgold" <gt@kestrel.co.nz>
- Cc: "W3C Disaster Management Ontology List" <public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <c09b00eb0706192156o2defc4ach3d7785149c0b808@mail.gmail.com>
Hi William I did not see your post - did you post offlist? Legitimate concern, and to infrastructure you are obviously referring to the internet, I guess however, I am not just thinking sahana, and I am not just thinking locally Assume an emergency takes place where I am (I seem to have earthquale follow me everywhere I go these days). My friends everywhere else in the world will still be able to help me better and faster if they can pull up relevantly filtered information using normal search engines and browsers. I think there is one circumastance in which the global infranstructure is all down, such as an electromagnetic storm passes the earth and stalls all our communication systems, but I havent quite thought what to do about that. That woud have to be plan B P On 6/20/07, Gavin Treadgold <gt@kestrel.co.nz> wrote: > > > Hi William, > > I didn't imply that this necessarily required a connection to the > outside world, it could be a standalone Sahana server that maintains > radio call signs and satellite phone numbers (in addition to normal > communication methods) to be used when traditional communications > infrastructure fails, and provides a manual list with tickboxes to be > checked off after each sat/radio call is made. Or we may be able to > use packet radio... > > There are many different types of events, and they all have different > impacts on infrastructure (e.g. a pandemic the communications > infrastructure will still work, it just may suffer heavier than > normal loading). Just because communications channels are > unavailable, it doesn't mean that you should stop maintaining > communications directories - in fact when you have flakey > communications, a good and up-to-date directory with a variety of > channels identified is critical. > > Sahana is being designed to handle all these circumstances, and works > happily as a self contained server - independently of communications. > > Cheers Gav > > On 20/06/2007, at 08:41, William Waites wrote: > > Nifty indeed, however in practical scenarios it is important to > > address > > infrastructure that would normally be used for this sort of thing that > > may not be available. > > > > Simply a caution about depending too much upon infrastructure that may > > disappear the moment it is needed... > > -- Paola Di Maio ***** School of Information Technology Mae Fah Luang University Chiang Rai - Thailand *********************************************
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 04:56:44 UTC