- From: Ryan Lanham <rlanham1963@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 12:25:19 -0400
- To: "paola.dimaio@gmail.com" <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Cc: "W3C Ontology List Disaster Management" <public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org>, "Max Stephenson" <mstephen@exchange.vt.edu>
- Message-ID: <9134ad230708090925k73bea418i5452ecb5fc36b219@mail.gmail.com>
To the general list: To those discussion XG related issues: I would just like to report that I am gearing up to write a dissertation on governance of FOSS projects in humanitarian relief, partly at the suggestion of Louiqa Raschid. My advisor is Max Stephenson at Virginia Tech. I will be contacting several of you as that research process continues, but in the interim, since this XG discussion is so on point, I just wanted to introduce myself to let you know I am lurking out here. I'd be grateful for any thoughts and suggestions (particularly from Paul Currion who was recommended to me by the US Holocaust Museum where I have had several discussions on Darfur and their Google Earth based mapping projects with Michael Graham.) I am on Facebook and several other sites. My email is rlanham1963@gmail.com I am 44, a former Internet entrepreneur and IBM product manager. My main concern is governance of FOSS efforts that run along lines of "leaderless" organizations (Starfish and Spider sorts of things) and collaborative/voluntary efforts and their relationships to enabling foundations, etc. Pointers most welcome. Thank you, Ryan Lanham Virginia Tech On 8/9/07, paola.dimaio@gmail.com <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > So, what I am saying is that (1) I would like to keep all issues > > originating in political structures out of the XG, and at the same time > > (2) the work of the XG must be defined with an awareness of the > > political issues in the field, so that important parties see the XG as > > an opportunity, not a threat. > > HI Olle > > I am sure most of us will agree - thing is that our 'users' must move > within political constraints and its the politics that prevents > cooperation (more than the technology at times) > > therefore we should design accordingly - if we simply 'avoid > acknowledging' the issue, > we may produce something that is not easily usable from that viewpoint > > How do you think such 'awareness' and 'neutrality' should be > reflected in our work? > > pdm > > -- Ryan Lanham Virginia Tech rlanham@vt.edu rlanham1963@gmail.com 540-552-1550
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 23:06:24 UTC