W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub@w3.org > August 2015

Re: Prioritisation

From: Kaveh Bazargan <kaveh@rivervalleytechnologies.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:03:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ2R9pipm6HwnRbrUDzE4agwkT6N88FrV967_ae_xXAu-OTfjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, "public-digipub@w3.org" <public-digipub@w3.org>
On 4 August 2015 at 18:50, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com> wrote:

> A quick clarification. I am quite sure that in her e-mail Deborah is using
> the term "pagination" to mean "maintaining a record in the digital file of
> where the page breaks occur in the paginated version of record." That's
> essential to accessibility and other useful things as well (citations,
> cross references, indexes, etc. in a world in which print is still
> considered the version of record and references to its page breaks are
> common.) That's not the same as making the _*rendered pages*_ in the
> digital file replicate those in the print.—Bill K
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>
But Bill, how do we make the page breaks in the electronic version to be
the same as those of the print pages unless we have the same elements and
layout? For instance if a floating figure is missing from an electronic
page, do we just make a short page and break where the paper copy breaks?
That would lead to very ugly results.

-- 
Kaveh Bazargan
Director
River Valley Technologies
@kaveh1000
+44 7771 824 111
www.rivervalleytechnologies.com
www.bazargan.org
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2015 21:38:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 August 2015 21:38:59 UTC