W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub@w3.org > August 2015

Re: Prioritisation

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 06:45:10 +0100
To: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
Cc: public-digipub@w3.org
Message-ID: <55C1A2E6.5000104@w3.org>
On 04/08/2015 16:03, Dave Cramer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org
> <mailto:ishida@w3.org>> wrote:
>     looking at the prioritisation at
>     https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15IsDMPwSXx197Iqe4I9xh7K8anmJ5c0-OFEG7w0LHYM/edit?usp=sharing
>     i found myself  wondering what the priorities mean, and how they
>     were arrived at.
> Hi Richard,
> The spreadsheet was used to gather information as this work was being
> started. The main effort is now directed towards this HTML document:
> http://w3c.github.io/dpub-pagination/priorities.html

ah, i was unaware of that. Looks interesting. I'll take a closer look, 
but i have a couple of observations below after a quick scan.  Perhaps 
the spreadsheet should point people to the html page?

[1] are you aware of the tests we have in the i18n test suite – and more 
importantly, the fact that we have pages showing how well features are 
supported on browsers.

for example, section 3.3.2 of the html file is about ruby.  We have 
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repo/results/ruby-html which shows 
results of basic tests for ruby markup implementation for Firefox, 
Chrome, Safari, Opera, Edge and IE.  (We need to develop tests for ruby 
styling still, and i have that in mind now that Firefox support the CSS 
Ruby spec.)

you can run the tests yourself, eg. to see the first test listed, click 
on the test link column to go to

it's important to note, btw, that it's possible for anyone to send in 
results for additional browsers, including Android, Safari Mobile, 
Chrome Mobile, UC Browser (chinese), Opera Android and Opera Mini, or 
another browser. (Instructions are at 

you can find all the i18n tests we have at 

[2] it's great that you're planning to encourage the implementers to 
address certain things. I think the i18n folks should coordinate with 
you on things of mutual interest.  I'll see what i can do to raise 
awareness with them.

[3]  the References section contains a link to Latin Req, but not to 
other lreqs.  You can find a list of them, and other requirements docs at

Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2015 05:45:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:34:52 UTC