- From: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:13:21 -0700
- To: Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Deborah Kaplan <deborah.kaplan@suberic.net>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADExNBMJE0rEDW=nvxT5kPX=PFZeH6dwHa9+hewaX=YAHeFHkw@mail.gmail.com>
+1 G On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org> wrote: > Thanks Ivan, looks great. > > Thanks > EOM > > Charles LaPierre > Technical Lead, DIAGRAM and Born Accessible > E-mail: charlesl@benetech.org > Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y > Skype: charles_lapierre > Phone: 650-600-3301 <(650)%20600-3301> > > > > On Oct 26, 2016, at 7:02 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > Charles, Deborah, > > I have now added the separate accessibility table to the separate draft: > > https://rawgit.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/reorg-3rd-round/index.html > ##accessibility > > Ivan > > On 25 Oct 2016, at 18:36, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Heather started to work on the next round of reorganization, and I picked > it up from her today. The current results are here: > > https://rawgit.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/reorg-3rd-round/index.html > > (I still keep it in a separate branch). > > Beyond the changes we discussed on the call, I have also made some > additional ones; I have listed them below. I have also some specific need > for feedbacks: > > * I have added the use case of Eric Hellmann[1] into 2.1.2 (4th use case) > mainly not to loose it in the reorganization (note that I have slightly > changed the language.). However, this has not been approved by the IG yet. > To be reviewed by the group and need feedback whether we should keep it or > not (personally I am fine keeping it). > > * I am not really sure of the formulation in 3.4 but I ran a bit out of > steam on how to formulate them. Input would be welcome > > * Charles, Deborah: > - I have not touched 2.1.1; I believe we agreed that you guys would rework > that section. > - the appendix on the accessibility back-references is just a placeholder > for now; I will complete that appendix later this week > - I have explicitly added annotation to the description of the very first > requirement which, I believe, means that there is no need for a separate > use case on the accessibility of annotations because it is 'just' a > resource like all others > - I have removed the separate section on Accessibility Metadata because > overlapping with what is now section 2.2.9. Note that I have moved two use > cases from the previous version into this to draw attention on the > accessibility metadata itself. Please check whether the reference I used is > the right one or not. > > > Other changes that I have done on the fly: > > - Changed the title of the document to (Packaged) Web Publications > (actually, this was discussed at TPAC, not at the call) > - The first item of the terminology section was related to > "offline/online", and was a leftover pre-TPAC. I have simply commented out > that item for now, we should see whether there is a need for an > offline/online terminology item in the first place > - The terms "Web Publication" and "Packaged Web Publication" have been > added to the terminology section. I also removed the term 'Publication' > which became essentially a duplicate of a Web Publication > - Sections on finding resources, essential resources, etc, have been moved > to the part on Web Publications > - The section on data included use cases that were really related to the > management of specific javascript libraries, and their role v.a.v. data was > incidental. These were commented out, leaving only one use case, but moving > one (that was really controlling whether a Javascript library should be > used offline or in a package) into the requirement on constituent > resources. > - I simplified the hierarchy for distribution as well as for archival, > which now consisted of two, resp. one, use cases only > - I have split the manifest related use cases in the previous section 3, > moved what sounded like only WP specific to section 2. This simplified the > hierarchy of section 3, too. > > Continue tomorrow afternoon…: finalize the accessibility appendix, and one > more thorough review before merging > > Ivan > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/pull/150 > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Technical Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 <+31%206%2041044153> > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Technical Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 <+31%206%2041044153> > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2016 15:13:50 UTC