Re: For the discussion on the PWP

>
> This goes back to how exactly we would draw the line for what a WP is (and
> maybe we get to the profiling discussion!). I could envisage two
> approaches. A WP is indeed a collection of resources, but:
>
> 1. it is all under the "control" of the publisher; essentially looks like
> an unpacked EPUB put on the Web, all the resources are "local". There are
> of course references to external resources, but they are external
> 2. there is no limitation, it is an arbitrary collection of Web resources
> regardless of where they are, which domain, under whose control, etc.
>
> You see to refer to a WP version 2 above and, in that case, you are of
> course right. But, as we just see, things become more complicated. My
> mental model is currently dominated by version #1, which is of course way
> more restrictive but also simplifies things. At some point we will have to
> decide which way we go; I am not convinced that the general approach of #2
> is a direction we really want to take. But that is up for discussion.
>

Even if a publication is under the control of a publisher, it would make a
lot of sense to allow them to re-use resources that they've already
published, potentially on multiple domains or sub-domains.
Let's take media on the Web: Vox Media could decide to create a publication
about Virtual Reality and re-use content from The Verge, Polygon & Vox for
this purpose.

I don't really think that this is where we can draw a line, or that drawing
any line at all is necessary.

Hadrien