- From: David Wood <david.wood@ephox.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:16:39 +1000
- To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
- Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABdBTrYgiyeMJehos+FApN0enwpUASpnmjY9CJ8gUrM8E+1Skg@mail.gmail.com>
I, for one, would be deeply unhappy about embedding Crossref's service as a mandatory component. Regards, Dave -- David Wood On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) < rse@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > SInce we're talking about DOIs... > > I am struggling right now with Crossref's display rule changes ( > http://blog.crossref.org/2016/09/new-crossref-doi-display-guidelines.html); > my steering committee has _serious_ reservations about forcing people > through a single gateway to get to documents. What we do now is have the > DOI in a urn format, and additionally a URL with the actual target for our > documents. If we switch that to just the one URI that goes through > Crossref, then what's to protect people from being tracked as they go > through Crossref's servers? In countries like Turkey and China, if the > government demands access to the logs to see who is accessing what > material, Crossref would have to comply. Since we have documents that > enable people to rebuild the Internet (and they did, back when Egypt shut > down access to the Internet a few years ago), it's actually a reasonable > concern. > > Has this come up in any conversations you all know about? > > -Heather > > > On 11/8/16 8:10 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > > And a related one: > > http://blog.crossref.org/2016/11/urls-and-dois-a- > complicated-relationship.html > > > On 8 Nov 2016, at 17:01, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com> > wrote: > > And, along the same lines: https://www.w3.org/blog/2016/10/doidona-vs-the- > internet/ > > *Tzviya Siegman* > Information Standards Lead > Wiley > 201-748-6884 > tsiegman@wiley.com > > *From:* Tim Cole [mailto:t-cole3@illinois.edu <t-cole3@illinois.edu>] > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 08, 2016 10:57 AM > *To:* 'W3C Digital Publishing IG' > *Subject:* DOIs in practice > > Having missed yesterday's call, I apologize if this blog post has already > come up, but just in case I thought some might find it interesting: > > *http://ws-dl.blogspot.com/2016/11/2016-11-07-linking-to-persistent.html > <http://ws-dl.blogspot.com/2016/11/2016-11-07-linking-to-persistent.html>* > > As the post describes, even when a user clicks on a DOI, they often end up > bookmarking or forwarding the non-DOI link. There are various ways > publishers try to mitigate against this, and the post suggests another > approach, but at present practice varies widely, so the problem persists > (pun intended). > > The blog is one maintained by Michael Nelson's digital library group at > Old Dominion University. > > Tim Cole > University of Illinois at UC > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Technical Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2016 23:17:13 UTC