- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:10:10 +0100
- To: Tzviya Siegman <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Cc: Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <608AC9C7-925D-4D3A-A863-6F3EBAD08433@w3.org>
And a related one: http://blog.crossref.org/2016/11/urls-and-dois-a-complicated-relationship.html <http://blog.crossref.org/2016/11/urls-and-dois-a-complicated-relationship.html> > On 8 Nov 2016, at 17:01, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com> wrote: > > And, along the same lines: https://www.w3.org/blog/2016/10/doidona-vs-the-internet/ <https://www.w3.org/blog/2016/10/doidona-vs-the-internet/> > > Tzviya Siegman > Information Standards Lead > Wiley > 201-748-6884 > tsiegman@wiley.com <mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com> > > From: Tim Cole [mailto:t-cole3@illinois.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 10:57 AM > To: 'W3C Digital Publishing IG' > Subject: DOIs in practice > > Having missed yesterday's call, I apologize if this blog post has already come up, but just in case I thought some might find it interesting: > > http://ws-dl.blogspot.com/2016/11/2016-11-07-linking-to-persistent.html <http://ws-dl.blogspot.com/2016/11/2016-11-07-linking-to-persistent.html> > > As the post describes, even when a user clicks on a DOI, they often end up bookmarking or forwarding the non-DOI link. There are various ways publishers try to mitigate against this, and the post suggests another approach, but at present practice varies widely, so the problem persists (pun intended). > > The blog is one maintained by Michael Nelson's digital library group at Old Dominion University. > > Tim Cole > University of Illinois at UC ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2016 16:10:30 UTC