Maybe I'm just wearing too many hats, and it's constricting the bloodflow to my brain, but it seems to be - while we shouldn't actually dictate or care how a reading system does something, we should most certainly look to solve our problems with existing tools, especially ones that are also part of a standards committee and implementation exists. -Nick On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Cramer, Dave <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com> wrote: > On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote: > > Nick – the specifics of how an RS chooses (or not) to cache are out of > scope for PWP. They may make sense for some sort of format-specific work > (eg. best practices for PWP with EPUB) but we don’t care about it here. > > Remember – PWP is format/packaging and implementation agnostic. (we > seemed to all agree to that pre-holidays) > > > The fact that an existing web technology can solve a critical use case for > PWP is on-topic in my opinion, and learning about such things can only help > our work. Such technologies may not be a part of the documents we produce, > but saying "we don't care about it here" I think sends the wrong message. > > Dave > This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended > recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand > that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. > Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network. > -- - Nick Ruffilo @NickRuffilo http://Aerbook.com http://twitch.tv/TheWizardLlewyn http://ZenOfTechnology.com <http://zenoftechnology.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2016 15:30:45 UTC