Re: [dpub-loc] Draft update

We will agree to disagree :).  But I agree it’s just a note in a discussion document…

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>>
Date: Friday, February 12, 2016 at 9:54 AM
To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com<mailto:lrosenth@adobe.com>>
Cc: Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be<mailto:ben.demeester@ugent.be>>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: [dpub-loc] Draft update


On 12 Feb 2016, at 12:43, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com<mailto:lrosenth@adobe.com>> wrote:

Please remove the comment that includes service workers – it (or any other implementation detail) doesn’t belong here.

Well… the only mention of SW-s are in a parenthetical remark. And the remark is important, I believe, as a general message insofar as, when defining the behaviour of the PWP Processor, we probably have to nail down some features that may have been inspired by SW-s in the first place. Ie, I do not see any harm leaving it in in a discussion document…

I did change that item somewhat and put it in a different style to make it clear it is not part of the main flow.

Ivan


[more comments in the other msgs in the thread]

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>>
Date: Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 12:28 PM
To: Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be<mailto:ben.demeester@ugent.be>>
Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: [dpub-loc] Draft update
Resent-From: <public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:28:14 +0000

Ben, everybody


I have given some thoughts over the last discussion we had yesterday at the end of the call. I have spent some time to make a more detailed writeup over those questions; instead of sending around a very long mail, I have uploaded a separate document onto the repo:

https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-loc/blob/gh-pages/drafts/ivans-musings.md


Comments/changes/issues please!

To increase your appetite, here are the two questions I was musing about:

• Q1: What is the answer of the server to a 'HTTP Get http://book.org/published-books/1' request?
• Q2: How does a PWP Processor accesses the Mona Lisa image when 'http://book.org/published-books/1/img/mona_lisa.jpg' is requested by the Reading System?

Caveat: my regrets for the next call. I am double booked in February, and next time I must go to my other call:-(

Cheers

Ivan


On 11 Feb 2016, at 13:50, Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be<mailto:ben.demeester@ugent.be>> wrote:

Hi all,

I updated the markdown on the git repo (https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-loc/blob/gh-pages/locators.md), trying to incorporate the discussion of the previous call.

I also added 2 new sections: functionalities (i.e., what specific functionalities are needed to support PWPs, e.g., mapping from canonical to state locator, displaying a resource, etc.), and issues.

Issue 1 is the issue as discussed last on the call, issue 2 is one Ivan mentioned in his last comment to the previous draft: what do you get when GETting the unpacked PWP?

Comments are most welcome!

Kind regards,
Ben


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/

mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704







----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/

mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704