-1, unless we plan to replace the existing white paper at /TR/pwp. And then we'd need a new short name for that, and changing short names leads to madness, as the CSSWG has (not) learned over and over. Can we continue to use pwp-ucr? Dave From: <Siegman>, "Siegman, Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>> Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 4:36 PM To: "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>> Subject: [dpub] short title for PWP-UCR Resent-From: <public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 4:37 PM Hi All, We neglected to choose a short title for the FPWD for the PWP Use Case document. Please vote (+1/-1) for http://www.w3.org/TR/pwp Thank you, Tzviya Tzviya Siegman Information Standards Lead Wiley 201-748-6884 tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com> This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network.
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2016 20:50:54 UTC