W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > August 2016

Re: [dpub] short title for PWP-UCR

From: Cramer, Dave <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:50:17 +0000
To: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D3EB6964.6B5B4%dave.cramer@hbgusa.com>
-1, unless we plan to replace the existing white paper  at /TR/pwp. And then we'd need a new short name for that, and changing short names leads to madness, as the CSSWG has (not) learned over and over.

Can we continue to use pwp-ucr?


From: <Siegman>, "Siegman, Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>>
Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 4:36 PM
To: "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>>
Subject: [dpub] short title for PWP-UCR
Resent-From: <public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 4:37 PM

Hi All,

We neglected to choose a short title for the FPWD for the PWP Use Case document.  Please vote (+1/-1) for


Thank you,

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead

This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network.
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2016 20:50:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:30 UTC