- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:58:56 +0200
- To: Nicholas Taylor <ntay@stanford.edu>
- Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 22 August 2016 09:59:06 UTC
Nicholas, thanks! One comment: it may be worth adding an extra reference, when appropriate, to a fundamental use case or to refer where a specific requirement goes even beyond. I think archiving is important enough to be kept separate even if there is an overlap, but it is good to make the links. I found two suspects: your 7.1 is strongly related, in my view, to 2.2.1, and 7.2 is also related (though maybe a bit looser) to 2.1.11 Thanks! Ivan > From: Nicholas Taylor <ntay@stanford.edu> > Date: Friday, August 19, 2016 at 1:07 PM > To: "public-digipub-ig@w3.org" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org> > Subject: Archiving use cases section updated > Resent-From: <public-digipub-ig@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Friday, August 19, 2016 at 1:07 PM > > Hi all, > > The Archiving section of the PWP Use Cases and Requirements document has been updated. See latest additions here: http://w3c.github.io/dpub-pwp-ucr/#archiving > > Thanks! > > ~Nicholas > -- > Nicholas Taylor | Web Archiving Service Manager | Stanford University Libraries DLSS > E-mail: ntay@stanford.edu | Mobile: (650) 492-9025 | Twitter: @nullhandle > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Monday, 22 August 2016 09:59:06 UTC