W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Annotation UCs

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:12:41 +0200
Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D145B961-9625-4947-83A8-B2276118B583@w3.org>
To: Boris Anthony <boris@rebus.foundation>

> On 22 Aug 2016, at 11:03, Boris Anthony <boris@rebus.foundation> wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I’ve added a section for Annotation UCs.
> http://w3c.github.io/dpub-pwp-ucr/#annotation
> 
> I had a few of my own (I don’t assume they are novel but did not see them expressed elsewhere in the document).
> That said, there are a small handful of annotation related UCs scattered about… perhaps consolidating them is worth doing?

Or referring to them, the way it was done in, eg,

http://w3c.github.io/dpub-pwp-ucr/#accessibility

> 
> With the caveat of course that these should be annotations UCs that are specific to PWP “realities” (heh) and not already provided for or alluded to in the Annotation WG’s work.
> 
> 
> Bonus thought: persistent reliable annotation display in-situ requires a standard way of “mapping” a document; how to locate points in a document to which various annotation types and behaviors are attached.

I am not sure I understand what you mean...


> Is it in this group’s, or Annotation WG’s, purview to broach this topic or is that left to the field to define best practices?
> 
> 
> waving from a chilly Berlin,

:-(

Cheers

Ivan


> B.


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704





Received on Monday, 22 August 2016 09:12:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:30 UTC