- From: Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:34:18 -0400
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 06:47 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote: > See my correction e-mail. However, what you are really talking about > is the "label" for the note, not the actual reference to the > note. Although > they both require (presumably similar) styling. Often the reference for a footnote in text is superscripted but the numbers next to the actual note are not superscripted and are at normal size followed by a full stop and space (US: period). For a bibliography there may be parenthises or brackets around the reference (Smith, 1961) in the text, and those parenthises may be absent in the actual sorted bilbliography. Sorting may be by senior author (e.g. in mathematics) or by date, and there may be references that are not cited (which is usually frowned upon except in an annotated bibliography, but that's not for the formatting system to decide!) > CSS Counter Styles Level 3 [1] (which is a CR) has fairly rich > support for this, and is how I envisioned footnotes being supported > natively. I had not thought about styling the "counter" on the note > itself. Presumably that is possible but I am not an expert on that > spec nor its take up. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/css-counter-styles-3/ I think there are significant take-up problems. But hey, more use cases might help provde motivation. Firefox seems to be the only browser listed on caniuse.com to support @counter-style. Liam -- Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2016 18:34:23 UTC