Re: HTML-Note and bibliographies

> On 26 Apr 2016, at 12:06, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
> 
> In short: yes.  At least, that's my vision.
> 
> Something as simple as:
> 
> note { vertical-align: super; font-size:80%; }

I do not understand. That seems to define the styling for the whole (foot)note. What I was referring to is the sign appearing, usually, on the left side of the footnote.

I.

> 
> would achieve what you were talking about.  However, I think I would also propose that the default presentation for note is equivalent to the default presentation for <sup> anyway...  Since that is typically what is expected.
> 
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:
> 
>> On 26 Apr 2016, at 11:04, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io <mailto:shane@spec-ops.io>> wrote:
>> 
>> And that wouldn't be a problem at all in the model I proposed.  Use @type="1" and *poof* - arabic numbers.  Different groups for different numbering sequences if you like.
> 
> There is a more general question, then. Is there an easy *and standard* way to access the number from CSS? Ie, something using note:before, a standard class with a spam, something like that. If that is the case, then I can control whether the arabic number would appear as superscript.
> 
> (I was really reacting on Liam's comment that the value in the title cannot have markup, ie, <sup>)
> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 26 Apr 2016, at 01:40, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io <mailto:shane@spec-ops.io>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Comments inline:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org <mailto:liam@w3.org>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 12:07 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote:
>>> > There was a question in the meeting today about whether a
>>> > bibliography
>>> >
>>> [...]
>>> >    - If "type" is empty for a note, then prefer its title attribute
>>> > for
>>> >    display value
>>> 
>>> In general it's poor design to take text content from attributes,
>>> because that precludes having markup (e.g. if a bibliographic reference
>>> italicizes "et al." in the list of authors or puts a journal volume
>>> number in bold, or has Japanese ruby annotations). So I'm a little wary
>>> of this. See [Quin, Rueben, Io _et. al_, 1984_b_] for details :-).
>>> 
>>> Yeah - I am aware of this (obviously).  But I don't really have a good alternative that would be both flexible AND easy to use.  The title attribute accommodates popular citation styles (e.g., APA).   Do you have an alternate suggestion?
>> 
>> Well… I have seen bibliographies in history (my wife is a historian) where the citation mark is an arabic number in superscript:-(
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Digital Publishing Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
>> mobile: +31-641044153 <tel:%2B31-641044153>
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Shane McCarron
>> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
> mobile: +31-641044153 <tel:%2B31-641044153>
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704