W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > September 2015

RE: Best citation format for accessibility

From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:30:15 +0000
To: Olaf Drümmer <olaf@druemmer.com>, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>
CC: Bill McCoy <bmccoy@idpf.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "W3C Digital Publishing IG" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <70b5956e59f94f9593ec6f24e9982f18@CAR-WNMBP-006.wiley.com>
Many citations use specific bolding and italics to indicate specific information, such as which text is title, which text is ISSN, and so on.

I am not aware of a plan to introduce a module of ARIA for citations.

Tzviya Siegman
Digital Book Standards & Capabilities Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: Olaf Drümmer [mailto:olaf@druemmer.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 12:20 PM
To: Bill Kasdorf
Cc: Olaf Drümmer; Bill McCoy; Robin Berjon; W3C Digital Publishing IG
Subject: Re: Best citation format for accessibility

On 22 Sep 2015, at 17:50, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com<mailto:bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>> wrote:


My point is that from an accessibility point of view, the components of a citation are generally already known; the challenge is getting them from JATS to HTML.


Why would one care from an accessibility point of view?

A sighted user looking at a print version (a electronic version rendered on some screen) of a citation doesn't have that granular information provided as part of the visual rendering.

Olaf
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2015 16:30:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:12 UTC