> On 07 Sep 2015, at 21:39 , Olaf Drümmer <olaf@druemmer.com> wrote: > > Would this discussion become easier if based on a starting point like: > > On 7 Sep 2015, at 16:48, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote: > >> [[[ >> A **Web Document** is a uniquely identifiable and curated set of interrelated Web resources. A Web Document should be constructed of resources whose formats enable (individually or in conjunction with other resources in the same Web Document) a graceful adaptation to the users' needs. >> >> A **Portable (Web) Document** is a Web Document that has enough information to ensure a graceful degradation when presented to the user even offline. A Portable Web Document should also include enough information for a graceful adaptation to the user's needs. >> ]]] > > we distinguished between > **Web Document** and **good Web Document** > and also between > **Portable (Web) Document** and **good Portable (Web) Document** > > Requirements like "graceful adaptation to the users' needs" are all fine, but some web documents might just not adapt gracefully and still would have to be called a web documents… I am a bit afraid of overcomplicating things by introducing too many terms. This is why it says "should" and not a "must": this is a pragmatic choice... Ivan > > > Just my 2 cents… > > > Olaf > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 04:23:06 UTC