Would this discussion become easier if based on a starting point like: On 7 Sep 2015, at 16:48, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > [[[ > A **Web Document** is a uniquely identifiable and curated set of interrelated Web resources. A Web Document should be constructed of resources whose formats enable (individually or in conjunction with other resources in the same Web Document) a graceful adaptation to the users' needs. > > A **Portable (Web) Document** is a Web Document that has enough information to ensure a graceful degradation when presented to the user even offline. A Portable Web Document should also include enough information for a graceful adaptation to the user's needs. > ]]] we distinguished between **Web Document** and **good Web Document** and also between **Portable (Web) Document** and **good Portable (Web) Document** Requirements like "graceful adaptation to the users' needs" are all fine, but some web documents might just not adapt gracefully and still would have to be called a web documents… Just my 2 cents… Olaf
Received on Monday, 7 September 2015 19:40:17 UTC