On 13 November 2015 at 15:49, Gunderson, Jon R <jongund@illinois.edu> wrote: > Steve, > > > > It seems like we are always finding complicated and indirect ways to show > important relationships for long descriptions and instructions. > > > > ARIA doesn’t even define a role=”description” or role=”instructions” even > though we talk about defining relationships to these concepts all the time > and WCAG 2.0 defines “description” and “instructions” relationships as > important for accessibility. > > > > Just trying to represent the author in these issues in proposing solutions > that simplifies accessibility for authors. > Hi Jon, talking about this use case how is use of details/summary overcomplicating? I am all for supporting authors, but don't want us to waste time on speciing new features such as img twisty that I am sure will not get implementer support. As far as aria defining new roles, i belive that role=description is already being discussed. -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>
Received on Friday, 13 November 2015 15:59:11 UTC