- From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:52:00 +0000
- To: "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2015 15:52:32 UTC
FYI If anyone has samples of <details>/<summary> in use for extended description, please pass them along so that we can help out with documentation of best practices. Tzviya Tzviya Siegman Digital Book Standards & Capabilities Lead Wiley 201-748-6884 tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com> From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 10:42 AM To: WAI Protocols & Formats Cc: DPUB-ARIA Subject: Proposal: remove aria-describedat from the ARIA 1.1 specification After discussions with Microsoft and following the bug tracker for Firefox it appears that <details>/<summary> is going to be implemented at some point in both Edge and Firefox. This addresses the gaps in browser support. A media query will need to be created at some point to handle the showing/hiding of this element, and I see those discussions are happening, but I believe this addresses the requirements of the digital publishing industry. Since this requirement is being met I would like to propose the removal of aria-describedat from the ARIA 1.1 specification at the next ARIA Working Group meeting. Are there any objections? Do you agree? We can vote on the next ARIA WG call but I wanted to give people a heads up. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2015 15:52:32 UTC