> I’ve responded to a few more of the comments in the google sheet. Thanks so much Dave! > I would encourage you to edit the math-related bits as you see fit, as your knowledge of this area is at least a billion times greater than my own. Mmm, not so sure ;-) I guess since it is a list of CSS issues pointing to MathML does not always seem right, e.g., pointing to element-based mlabeldtr seems off when I hear about future CSS counters work. Then again, MathML includes copious amounts of styling ability (but that's a different discussion). Peter. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Peter Krautzberger < > peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org> wrote: > > > > @Dave I'm not sure how best to incorporate the comments I've left in the > google sheet. Could I get some review before I edit the sheet itself? > > Hi Peter, > > I’ve responded to a few more of the comments in the google sheet. I would > encourage you to edit the math-related bits as you see fit, as your > knowledge of this area is at least a billion times greater than my own. > > It sounds like getting all the cross-reference stuff in GCPM [1] would be > helpful. And getting CSSWG to finally write a table spec ;) > > Thanks! > > Dave > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-gcpm/#cross-references > > >
Received on Friday, 26 June 2015 18:56:17 UTC