- From: Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:15:02 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABqxo81nJ=ptjH95PXL0yR+ThQWm4w565+=2Y4rqgA74k8XX_A@mail.gmail.com>
@Dave I'm not sure how best to incorporate the comments I've left in the google sheet. Could I get some review before I edit the sheet itself? Peter. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Thanks Dave, > > I had a chat with some of the Interaction Domain people lately. Some > takeaway message: > > - This sort of information (as well as the pagination use cases) are very > important for planning and feedback for the team. Specifically, Chris > Lilley will dive into the pagination use cases and, once he has digested > them, he is happy to come to one of our calls to discuss the various > approaches (Houdini or not Houdini, for example) with us. > > - Many of the notes in the table (and also in the remarks below) are > around the fact that a specific browser does not implement a specific > feature. The experience is that submitting bug reports on missing feature, > if coming from major operators/users/institutions/communities, is useful in > getting things moving. It is a bit of a pain to find the right > bugzilla/github/whatever instance that they listen to (if any:-) but it is > worth the trouble. > > - On the specific issue of hyphenation and chrome, it seems that there is > process: [1] seems to suggest that it is on its way now. :-) > > - Some of the issues are related to I18N activities. Note that they > maintain a kind of 'meta' document[2] on typography issues, referring to > other documents. Maybe checking those to see if features are in line with > those we have would be a good idea. > > General experience: we should publish/update our documents in a visible > manner more often. The fact that we have not republished latinreq for a > long time led them to believe that there are no outstanding issues with > CSS… We should find a way to make updates more often and actively notify > whomever we want to notify. > > B.t.w. [3] and [4] seems to be the right bug report areas for Firefox and > Chrome, respectively. I do not know what the rules are to submit new > reports… > > Thanks! > > Ivan > > [1] http://j.mp/1IzWL5D > [2] http://w3c.github.io/typography/ > [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=addHitRegion > [4] http://j.mp/1RxQZ9c > > > On 24 Jun 2015, at 16:40 , Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com> wrote: > > During the call today, Ivan expressed interest in having some more > detail on the CSS priorities. I've just started such an attempt: > > > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15IsDMPwSXx197Iqe4I9xh7K8anmJ5c0-OFEG7w0LHYM/edit?usp=sharing > > > > I have lots of work to do here, but just wanted to know if this looks > like a useful approach. > > > > > > Yesterday I asked folks on Twitter what improvements they wanted to see > to CSS. The most common responses were to have ebook reading systems > support more of the CSS that browsers do. > > > > The other major theme was about how ebook reading systems override the > CSS in EPUB files. This process is totally opaque to ebook developers, very > frustrating for all involved, and results in unpredictable end results. > Shining some light on this process, providing a way for developers to > respond to various types of overrides, and giving end users the control > they need would be of immense value. I think this should be a priority of > DPUB, perhaps even a task force. > > > > Many of the other suggestions related to typography--better control over > hyphenation, open type font features such as ligatures, and drop caps. > > > > * * * > > > > I've added priorities to the spreadsheet[1], and sorted by those > priorities. In general, specs exist for most of the features listed, but > browser support is often spotty. In many cases, some major browsers support > a given feature, and other major browsers don't. And that is our > fundamental issue. > > > > Dave > > > > [1] yes, all my priorities are wrong. > > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 07:15:31 UTC