> On 11 Jun 2015, at 15:26 , Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > P.S. I have to say that PLOS is not a really good example for quality. I was shocked to see that, on [2], all the numbers in the text are… images! It looks horrible in my browser, it is bad in so many ways… Sigh... > > Just wow! Here's how they mark up the number "1.8 million": > > <span class="inline-formula"><img src="article/asset?id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115253.e003.PNG" class="inline-graphic"></span> million > > Human-readable AND accessible. Nice job!* > > Is this an automated MathML to image conversion used inappropriately? That was my thought, too… I. > > Dave > > *This paragraph may be sarcastic > > > > [2] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115253 ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2015 13:38:38 UTC