W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > June 2015

RE: [W3C chairs] Identifying new groups and communities W3C should reach

From: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 21:25:51 +0000
To: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BLUPR06MB5635BC820659C126C10FECDDFBF0@BLUPR06MB563.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
A very belated response after having been traveling all the past two weeks. Last week I was in Warsaw for the IPTC Summer Meeting, and it struck me that those folks-news organizations like the Associated Press, Agence France Presse, Thomson-Reuters, the New York Times, and news agencies in various countries, to name a few-are also missing from the discussion. They are doing lots of very interesting things and are highly committed to Web technologies (semantic and otherwise). They are more up on RDF, JSON, HTML5, and other technical topics than most other sectors of publishing. And given both the extremely high volume of content they create and disseminate and the speed with which it is interchanged, they are all about machine-processable transactions.-Bill K

From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken [mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 8:30 PM
To: DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)
Subject: FW: [W3C chairs] Identifying new groups and communities W3C should reach

In keeping with today's discussions (attention scribenick: Nick), do we feel that the W3C is reaching all the stake holders?

Tzviya Siegman
Digital Book Standards & Capabilities Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: GALINDO Virginie [mailto:Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10:26 AM
To: W3C Chairs
Subject: [W3C chairs] Identifying new groups and communities W3C should reach

Dear chairs,

In the W3C AC forum, there are some discussions about the fact that some key groups, who do now have influence in the web, are not enough represented in W3C. This could refer to framework makers, new services providers, innovative think tank.  In other words, just ask yourself what are the innovative actors who are not in your group and that should be there. Note that this is not about recruiting new members, but making sure the W3C still represents the web at large...
Dropping a names on this mailing list would help. If we receive 100 suggestions, we may conclude that we have some work ahead...
Regards,

Virginie Galindo
W3C AB member / W3C Web Crypto WG chair / @poulpita on twitter
________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.
Received on Monday, 8 June 2015 21:26:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:02 UTC