W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > December 2015

Re: text-align examples

From: Hiroshi Sakakibara <sakakibara.hiroshi@bpsinc.jp>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 19:18:58 +0900
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Cc: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20151201191858.45A9.147D1882@bpsinc.jp>

On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:29:30 +0900
Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:

> > On 01 Dec 2015, at 14:59, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I'm intermittent on this thread, sorry if it was already discussed and I missed, but it looks like it's mostly about numbers, correct?
> > 
> > Assuming so, it'd be great if you could classify which use cases can be solved by tabular-num[1] and which cannot.
> > 
> > [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-3/#tabular-nums <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-3/#tabular-nums>
> So far, we were focused on gathering uses cases, rather than looking into how to solve them.
> That said, when looking at the numerical uses cases, tabular numbers form part of the solution, but only part. Once you've aligned the relevant character (".", or "," etc), they make things look neat. But they alone cannot align the "." in "102.3" and "1.050".
> Also, even if you have the same number of digits before and after the decimal point, they don't necessarily help if if you're using for example different font weights on different rows of the table.
> So, they useful, but not sufficient on their own.
>  - Florian

As Florian wrote, it would be a bit difficult to classify due to the
font weight issue and pre/suf-fix issue.

In addition, the alignment(layouting?) would differ in different
cultures.  So, I think, more examples are needed to go further
(My examples are mainly from Japanese..)



Sakakibara Hiroshi (skk@bpsinc.jp)
Beyond Perspective Solutions Co., Ltd. 
Tel: +81-3-6279-4320 Fax: +81-3-6279-4450
Web: http://www.bpsinc.jp/
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2015 10:19:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:20 UTC