- From: Nick Ruffilo <nickruffilo@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:25:49 -0400
- To: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@bell.net>
- Cc: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "Stein, Ayla" <astein@illinois.edu>, Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+Dds5_oLcgMmQChjQy+HezmJw4-WR5cL7WcVETdQFv6Z4y7ag@mail.gmail.com>
Isn't the <a> supposed to be an anchor and not a link? And <a> with a href="" is clearly a link, but otherwise, couldn't an anchor point be a logical generic grouping point. In the early days of web development, that is exactly how I utilized it: <a href="#gohere">Go there</a> <a id="gohere" name="gohere"/> <h1>This is where I want to be</h1> There is probably a better way to do this, but I would argue that <a> - unless it has been re-defined to mean link and not anchor (which is extremely possible, I've still to read MUCH of the w3c docs) it would fit. -Nick On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@bell.net> wrote: > A few points: > > - epub uses the epub:type value “pagebreak” to identify the elements > (the id name isn’t the indicator) > - epub also requires @title for a human-readable value (for > announcement by AT) > - the use of <a> for pagebreaks isn’t ideal. A page break not a link > to anywhere and never will be. A span is more typical. > > I’d also hate to think we need more markers in digital. CFIs, while > unwieldy to write, at least go in the right direction in getting away from > reliance on the presence of IDs + empty elements. They can also represent > ranges better than having to insert two markers, or whatever ugliness that > takes. > > ID-based markers are useful in the print/digital lookup scenario noted, > and they’ll have life until a better/simpler method of identifying > locations comes along, but they’re still god-awful things. > > You’d think in a digital world we could pull out/identify/highlight any > passage of text we want, not be as functionally useless to readers as page > numbers. But here we are... > > Matt > > *From:* Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:32 PM > *To:* Nick Ruffilo <nickruffilo@gmail.com> ; Dave Cramer > <dauwhe@gmail.com> > *Cc:* AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> ; Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> > ; Stein, Ayla <astein@illinois.edu> ; Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org> ; W3C > Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org> > *Subject:* RE: [dpub identifiers] Please review updated Identifiers TF > wiki > > > Precisely! Thanks. > > > > When people respond by saying, wrt pointing just to the start of the print > page on which the thing you really mean occurs (the thing the index entry > means, the thing the cross reference is referencing, etc.), "what the heck > good is that?", I point out that that is precisely all that those things > have ever done in print. J They just say "somewhere between this point, > where page 53 begins, and the next such milestone marker, which says where > page 54 begins . . . somewhere between those two markers is the thing I'm > trying to direct your attention to." So using them is regrettably no > better, but at least no worse, than what they've always done. > > > > --Bill K > > > > *From:* Nick Ruffilo [mailto:nickruffilo@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:25 PM > *To:* Dave Cramer > *Cc:* AUDRAIN LUC; Ivan Herman; Bill Kasdorf; Stein, Ayla; Thierry > Michel; W3C Digital Publishing IG > *Subject:* Re: [dpub identifiers] Please review updated Identifiers TF > wiki > > > > My apologies if this has been asked before, but is there a generic > "milestone" type ID? Ultimately that's what a page-number is. The same > way a section heading, or chapter is a chunk identifier, a page is ALSO a > chunk identifier. The fact that the context is related to a concept > foreign to screens (or at least, difficult to understand when it comes to > screens) if you think of it as a "physical_page_number" as opposed to just > "page_number" the conceptual chunk because significantly clearer and more > meaningful. > > > > If this doesn't make sense, let me know and I'll try to word it elsewise. > > > > -Nick > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:41 PM, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> > wrote: > > > In EPUB3 files, HTML content is tagged with empty anchors like : > "Ils n¹en veulent pas, ils n¹en <a id="page_182"/>veulent pas, elle lâche > dans un soupir en attrapant encore une lettre." > > This means that a new paper page starts at word « veulent ». > > In parallel, the EPUB3 nav document contains an ordered list of navigation > points in a <nav epub:type="page-list »> element : > <li> > <a href="chap22.html#page_182">Page 182</a> > </li> > Then the label of this paper page 182 is « Page 182 ». > > > In term of worflow, by good practice, we produced a new EPUB file as soon > as text corrections have been inserted in the reprint book. > > > > > > In EPUB3, there's metadata that should indicate which print edition the > pagination information is taken from [1]: > > > > <dc:source id="src-id">urn:isbn:9780375704024</dc:source> > > <meta refines="#src-id" property="identifier-type" scheme="onix:codelist5">15</meta> > > <meta refines="#src-id" property="source-of">pagination</meta> > > > > Dave > > > > [1] > http://www.idpf.org/epub/301/spec/epub-publications.html#sec-opf-dcsource > > > > > > > > -- > > - Nick Ruffilo > > @NickRuffilo > > http://Aerbook.com > > http://ZenOfTechnology.com <http://zenoftechnology.com/> > > > -- - Nick Ruffilo @NickRuffilo http://Aerbook.com http://ZenOfTechnology.com <http://zenoftechnology.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 18:26:18 UTC