- From: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:44:49 +0000
- To: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Dave Cramer <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Yes, I agree. I think Ivan's distinction is important, but I think both are important in the context of "what do publishers need to do?" -----Original Message----- From: AUDRAIN LUC [mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 12:18 PM To: Ivan Herman Cc: Dave Cramer; W3C Digital Publishing IG Subject: Re: [metadata] Who will consume our metadata? Ivan, Yes but that semantics of far from sufficient when this 'chapter' is a lesson, a recipe, a town to visit, a dictionary entry, and so on. We know what it is in our production workflow and we loose it in HTML. I really speak about content metadata as a source of intelligence in our books as a whole, not in chunks. I plan to add this need in the wiki, not only the global metadata for book discovery. From Bill point of view, I think it is relevant too in this task force, isn't it? Luc > Le 4 févr. 2014 à 17:35, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> a écrit : > > - When I mark an element in HTML5, say, a section element, as being a 'chapter' or an 'introduction', that attaches some semantics to that specific part of the book.
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 17:45:38 UTC