RE: schema.org and ONIX...

Just going through the responses . . . and as for this one, regrettably, Luc, I will not be able to attend LBF this year. So if you've been looking for me, you can stop trying . . . ;-) but I would love to talk with you about this in any case. BTW I will have to miss the DPUB call next week.

-----Original Message-----
From: AUDRAIN LUC [mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 4:12 AM
To: Ivan Herman
Cc: Bill Kasdorf; W3C Digital Publishing IG
Subject: Re: schema.org and ONIX...

Hi Ivan and Bill,

That's a very good exercise and I will share thoughts with Bill at London Book Fair if possible. 
I'm really interested as I'm wondering what it will bring for more ebooks discoverability on the Web beyond the ONIX feeds we provide already to distributors and digital bookstores. 

Best,
Luc


> Le 8 avr. 2014 à 05:24, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> a écrit :
> 
> Bill,
> 
> I am currently at a Linked Data Workshop at a conference in Seoul, which had a keynote from R. Guha, who is, in some sense, the "father" of schema.org. Listening to him (combining also with my past experience), and also referring to the note I sent around earlier this morning[1] I am more and more serious in thinking that a stripped-down version of ONIX defined in schema.org might be a great idea. Of course, we have to see whether there is a business interest and business case for this: is there a use case for publishers as well as for search engines? But if the answer is yes on both, than this may be an important thing to do.
> 
> I do know Guha personally relatively well, as well as Dan Brickley, who is the other person running schema.org's vocabulary development. I would be happy to make the links and go into the discussions but, of course, the question is whether publishers, as well as institutions like Bowker, would be interested by something like that. I think that clarifying this, ie, set up the use cases, would be perfectly in line with the IG's charter (although we probably would have to spawn a different group to make the specification itself, but that is all right.)
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Ivan
> 
> [1] http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/international/london-book-fair/article/61722-london-book-fair-2014-publishers-and-internet-standards.html

> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C 
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/

> mobile: +31-641044153
> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf

> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2014 15:11:01 UTC