- From: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:05:59 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, DANET PIERRE <PDANET@hachette-livre.fr>
- CC: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Ivan, OPDS is a syndication format for electronic publication[1]. OPDS spec is in version 1.1[2]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPDS [2] http://opds-spec.org/specs/opds-catalog-1-1-20110627/ Best, Luc -----Message d'origine----- De : Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] Envoyé : mardi 8 avril 2014 11:50 À : DANET PIERRE Cc : AUDRAIN LUC; Bill Kasdorf; W3C Digital Publishing IG Objet : Re: schema.org and ONIX... On 08 Apr 2014, at 18:38 , DANET PIERRE <PDANET@hachette-livre.fr> wrote: > It seems to be a good idea as well. > > Think about OPDS as well. OPDS? What is that? (Sorry, I am still a new kid on the block...) Ivan > > And Education text books vocabularies. > > Tnx > > Pierre > > Le 08/04/14 10:12, « AUDRAIN LUC » <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> a écrit : > >> Hi Ivan and Bill, >> >> That's a very good exercise and I will share thoughts with Bill at >> London Book Fair if possible. >> I'm really interested as I'm wondering what it will bring for more >> ebooks discoverability on the Web beyond the ONIX feeds we provide >> already to distributors and digital bookstores. >> >> Best, >> Luc >> >> >>> Le 8 avr. 2014 à 05:24, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> a écrit : >>> >>> Bill, >>> >>> I am currently at a Linked Data Workshop at a conference in Seoul, >>> which had a keynote from R. Guha, who is, in some sense, the >>> "father" of schema.org. Listening to him (combining also with my >>> past experience), and also referring to the note I sent around >>> earlier this morning[1] I am more and more serious in thinking that >>> a stripped-down version of ONIX defined in schema.org might be a >>> great idea. Of course, we have to see whether there is a business >>> interest and business case for this: is there a use case for >>> publishers as well as for search engines? But if the answer is yes on both, than this may be an important thing to do. >>> >>> I do know Guha personally relatively well, as well as Dan Brickley, >>> who is the other person running schema.org's vocabulary development. >>> I would be happy to make the links and go into the discussions but, >>> of course, the question is whether publishers, as well as >>> institutions like Bowker, would be interested by something like >>> that. I think that clarifying this, ie, set up the use cases, would >>> be perfectly in line with the IG's charter (although we probably >>> would have to spawn a different group to make the specification >>> itself, but that is all right.) >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> [1] >>> http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/international/london-boo >>> k-fai >>> r/article/61722-london-book-fair-2014-publishers-and-internet-standa >>> rds.h >>> tml >>> >>> ---- >>> Ivan Herman, W3C >>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>> GPG: 0x343F1A3D >>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 GPG: 0x343F1A3D FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2014 10:06:33 UTC