- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 18:50:03 +0900
- To: Pierre Danet <PDANET@hachette-livre.fr>
- Cc: Luc Audrain <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <E2DDA91B-E2FB-418C-B0A1-1314F10FC840@w3.org>
On 08 Apr 2014, at 18:38 , DANET PIERRE <PDANET@hachette-livre.fr> wrote: > It seems to be a good idea as well. > > Think about OPDS as well. OPDS? What is that? (Sorry, I am still a new kid on the block...) Ivan > > And Education text books vocabularies. > > Tnx > > Pierre > > Le 08/04/14 10:12, « AUDRAIN LUC » <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> a écrit : > >> Hi Ivan and Bill, >> >> That's a very good exercise and I will share thoughts with Bill at London >> Book Fair if possible. >> I'm really interested as I'm wondering what it will bring for more ebooks >> discoverability on the Web beyond the ONIX feeds we provide already to >> distributors and digital bookstores. >> >> Best, >> Luc >> >> >>> Le 8 avr. 2014 à 05:24, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> a écrit : >>> >>> Bill, >>> >>> I am currently at a Linked Data Workshop at a conference in Seoul, >>> which had a keynote from R. Guha, who is, in some sense, the "father" of >>> schema.org. Listening to him (combining also with my past experience), >>> and also referring to the note I sent around earlier this morning[1] I >>> am more and more serious in thinking that a stripped-down version of >>> ONIX defined in schema.org might be a great idea. Of course, we have to >>> see whether there is a business interest and business case for this: is >>> there a use case for publishers as well as for search engines? But if >>> the answer is yes on both, than this may be an important thing to do. >>> >>> I do know Guha personally relatively well, as well as Dan Brickley, who >>> is the other person running schema.org's vocabulary development. I would >>> be happy to make the links and go into the discussions but, of course, >>> the question is whether publishers, as well as institutions like Bowker, >>> would be interested by something like that. I think that clarifying >>> this, ie, set up the use cases, would be perfectly in line with the IG's >>> charter (although we probably would have to spawn a different group to >>> make the specification itself, but that is all right.) >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> [1] >>> http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/international/london-book-fai >>> r/article/61722-london-book-fair-2014-publishers-and-internet-standards.h >>> tml >>> >>> ---- >>> Ivan Herman, W3C >>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>> GPG: 0x343F1A3D >>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 GPG: 0x343F1A3D FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2014 09:50:37 UTC