On Oct 4, 2013, at 17:14 , Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> wrote: > If there is a W3C git server, To be precise, W3C has some sort of a company are on github, it does not run its own git server. Which is good because there are also tools that are github specific. Ivan > that'd be a bit more pleasant to work with than mercurial in my opinion. > Mercurial worked fine in the Provenance WG, but when you have multiple people editing at the same time, I think git might be a little easier to resolve conflicts. > > Other than that, I agree with the proposed methods, > > regards, > Tom > > 2013/10/4 Cramer, Dave <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com> > On 10/4/13 10:56 AM, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > > > > >Because it takes time for the admin to be set up, we should probably > >decide between mercurial or github; these have to be set up for us by our > >admin people... > > Since I'm agnostic about these things, I'm fine with your suggestion of > github. > > Thanks! > > Dave > > > This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network. > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 15:17:11 UTC