RE: [MathML] (I formally dub thee thread... was "AAP EPUB 3 Implementation Project" but shouldn't have been for quite some time)

I thought we had the call but I was forgetting about the China factor so I gave up after a while. Nobody home. . . .

From: Jean Kaplansky [mailto:Jean.Kaplansky@aptaracorp.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 11:08 AM
To: Bill Kasdorf; Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com
Cc: schwer@us.ibm.com; gerardoc@benetech.org; ivan@w3.org; peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org; public-digipub-ig@w3.org; public-digipub-ig-comment@w3.org
Subject: [MathML] (I formally dub thee thread... was "AAP EPUB 3 Implementation Project" but shouldn't have been for quite some time)

Consider it changed. :)

BTW - are we meeting today, or letting everyone in China sleep 'til tonight?

Thanks,

Jean Kaplansky
Solutions Architect
Aptara, Inc.
Email: jean.kaplansky@aptaracorp.com<mailto:jean.kaplansky@aptaracorp.com>
Skype: JeanKaplansky
Mobile: 518 487 9670

[cid:image001.jpg@01CD009C.E2F55700]

From: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com<mailto:bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>>
Date: Monday, November 11, 2013 at 10:44 AM
To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com<mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com<mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>>, "Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com<mailto:Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com>" <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com<mailto:Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com>>
Cc: Jean Kaplansky <jean.kaplansky@aptaracorp.com<mailto:jean.kaplansky@aptaracorp.com>>, "schwer@us.ibm.com<mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com>" <schwer@us.ibm.com<mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com>>, "gerardoc@benetech.org<mailto:gerardoc@benetech.org>" <gerardoc@benetech.org<mailto:gerardoc@benetech.org>>, "ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>" <ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>>, "peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org<mailto:peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>" <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org<mailto:peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>>, "public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>>, "public-digipub-ig-comment@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig-comment@w3.org>" <public-digipub-ig-comment@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig-comment@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: The AAP EPUB 3 Implementation Project

+1

Plus I suggest changing the subject line, because this discussion has not really been about the AAP EPUB 3 Implementation Project for quite a while. I'll leave it to one of the main folks in the discussion to rephrase, though.

From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com<mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 10:35 AM
To: Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com<mailto:Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com>
Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com<mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>; Jean.Kaplansky@aptaracorp.com<mailto:Jean.Kaplansky@aptaracorp.com>; schwer@us.ibm.com<mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com>; gerardoc@benetech.org<mailto:gerardoc@benetech.org>; ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>; peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org<mailto:peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>; public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>; public-digipub-ig-comment@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig-comment@w3.org>
Subject: Re: The AAP EPUB 3 Implementation Project

+1 to keeping discussions on the list -  this is what the list is for. Also it is educational for everyone that is not as well informed.

use of [MathML] at start of Subject would help with filtering.

thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Nov 6, 2013, at 2:23 PM, ext Cramer, Dave wrote:



On 11/6/13 10:39 AM, "Jean Kaplansky" <Jean.Kaplansky@aptaracorp.com<mailto:Jean.Kaplansky@aptaracorp.com>> wrote:

Dear Digital Publishing Interest Group -

Are these on-the-go math conversations something you want to see continue on this list, or should we take this off line and then come back to the group with use cases?

I ask because I think we can keep the conversation about MathML, MathJax, and Accessibility going in great detail, but I certainly don't want to hijack the W3 DPUB threads for this purpose if we should take the conversation off line.

I'm in favor of everything staying on the mailing list, as it's more transparent, and even though some of us may not contribute much to a particular subject, we may want to keep up with the discussion.

I think the CSS Working Group's approach could work, using [subject lines] to allow users to filter discussions. We can have [pagination], [mathml], etc.

Dave



Dave


________________________________
This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network.